All cases›Political violence›Assassination of Kim Jong-nam
Political violenceInvestigation closed

Assassination of Kim Jong-nam

A political violence case documented in Sepang, Selangor, Malaysia, during 13 Feb 2017.

Place
Sepang, Selangor, Malaysia
Date
13 Feb 2017
Status
Investigation closedThe investigating authority has ended its active investigation. This does not necessarily mean a court resolved the case.
Sources
2 cited sources

Updated 23 Aug 2026

Overview

Case overview

He died about 15 to 20 minutes later while being transported to the hospital. Four North Korean suspects, later confirmed as spies, left the airport shortly after the assassination and reached Pyongyang without being arrested. [1]

The Malaysian police responded by telling the lawyer to appeal to the high court. The lawyer blamed the police for not publishing the entire incident of the video during the attack as it was seen during the trials that police had deliberately cut off the key moments of the killing from the video that the accused (Aisyah) was adjusting glasses after attacking the victim (to which the footage of Aisyah wearing sunglasses was dropped as evidence is not appropriate when police are trying to convict his client of murder). Through the trial from 20 March, Hisyam screened a video of CCTV recorded at Noi Bai International Airport on 2 February 2017, of her client playing a prank on a Vietnamese government official named Trịnh Ngọc Linh in Hanoi less than two weeks before the attack, which showed her approaching the man from behind and putting her arms around his neck. [2]

Kuala Lumpur International Airport departure hall
Kuala Lumpur International Airport departure hallMorio · CC BY-SA 4.0 · View original ↗
Standard chronology

Key events

4 sourced milestones

Major events in the case, shown in chronological order.

  1. The central incident occurs

    Claims by North Korean authorities that Kim had died of a heart attack were disputed by pathologist Mohamad Shah Mahmood, who told the court there was no evidence of a heart attack on autopsy and that post-mortem toxicology reports showed VX was the sole cause of death.

    Source: Wikipedia ↗
  2. A central event is documented

    Meanwhile, on the Siti Aisyah side according to her lawyer Gooi Soon Seng, he slammed Malaysian investigators for not allowing him to meet Aisyah during her 14-day remand and not releasing portions of the video linked to the attack as well for the authorities failure to copy all the footage from the CCTV server of the airport which compromised the defence of Aisyah.

    Source: Wikipedia ↗
  3. The lawyer blamed the police for not publishing the

    The lawyer blamed the police for not publishing the entire incident of the video during the attack as it was seen during the trials that police had deliberately cut off the key moments of the killing from the video that the accused (Aisyah) was adjusting glasses after attacking the victim (to which the footage of Aisyah wearing sunglasses was dropped as evidence is not appropriate when police are trying to convict his client of murder).

    Source: Wikipedia ↗
  4. A central event is documented

    Through the trial from 20 March, Hisyam screened a video of CCTV recorded at Noi Bai International Airport on 2 February 2017, of her client playing a prank on a Vietnamese government official named Trịnh Ngọc Linh in Hanoi less than two weeks before the attack, which showed her approaching the man from behind and putting her arms around his neck.

    Source: Wikipedia ↗
Watch

Case videos

0 videos

No videos yet.
Discussion

Case discussion

Ask questions, compare sources, and share documented updates.

No discussions yet
Join the conversation

Reading is open to everyone. Create an account to contribute, reply, and mark useful findings.

Start the conversation
No discussions yet

Begin with a careful question or a documented finding.